(3) whether the body in a free state and the actual position of blacks in slavery entitled to freed

That is why since ancient times, Chinese almirah people almirah pay attention to home for the holiday?
[Reserved] Abraham Lincoln's speech (2013-03-07 14:48:45)
Abraham Lincoln (Abraham Lincoln ,1809-1865) 16th President of the United States, statesman, orator, February 12, 1809 Born in Kentucky, a poor pioneer family, parents are descendants of British immigrants, they farm and hunting for a living, the father except farming, but has also done a shoemaker, lumberjacks and carpenters, etc., in 1816 the family moved to southwestern Indiana, land reclamation, Lincoln 9 years old his mother died; Lincoln received only one year of primary education , relying on self-study to become a lawyer in 1836 1834 - 1842 became Members Illinois, was elected congressman in 1847, 1856 by the Whig Party into the Republican almirah Party, was elected president in 1860, he was leading the people into the Civil War, issued the "Emancipation Proclamation," saved the Union, the reunification of the United States, known as par with Washington's greatest president, almirah April 14, 1865 slavery was sympathetic to those who assassinated.
We do not have a tendency towards the latter situation it? If you suspect someone of this, let him carefully consider this: now an integral part of almost all the judiciary can be said to be the spirit of the principles of Nebraska and Dred Scott jurisprudence. Let him consider not only reflects the work of this institution to adapt and adapt to what extent, and the study of history it was built, and if he can do it, or, more precisely, he can not do, but if he can do, let him pursue a variety of designs and signs of concerted action taken by its main architect who made it from the beginning.
1854 New Year's Day, more than half of the states according to their state constitution to exclude almirah slavery, most states have also ruled out the quasi-slavery according to the Congressional ban. Four days later, started a fight, the result is that the entry ban revoked the Congress. This is open to the prospective state of slavery, becoming the first results of slavery advocates won. However, so far, Congress has done just this preservation of vested results and provide more opportunities for future almirah results, of course, almirah recognized that it is essential to get the people, whether it is true or approved surface . This necessity has not gone unnoticed, and was used on "people's sovereignty" or "divine autonomy," the famous debate "sacred autonomy" of course speaks only legitimate foundation of any government, but was misrepresented as this means: Any person who decides to enslave another person, a third party may not be opposed. This argument is in the following language written into the Nebraska bill: "true purpose and meaning of this Act is not in any state to establish quasi-slavery state by means of legislation, nor is it excluded quasi-slavery in all states and state; but to let the people of the land subject only to the United States Constitution in conditions completely free to create and handle a variety of systems in accordance with its own internal way. "thus giving rise to support the" people's sovereignty "and" sacred autonomy "in the hustle almirah and bustle. Opposition members said: "But let us modify the bill so that the people of the State of quasi-public statement may exclude slavery." Supporters of the bill, said: "We do not agree," and rejected the amendment.
While Nebraska bill for consideration by Congress when, one involving a black man's freedom lawsuit also being used by the Circuit Court of the United States, Missouri area for consideration: almirah the blacks were his master has inadvertently brought an Use a slave state and quasi-state ban applies to Congress, and long-term use him as a slave in both places. Nebraska Act and this lawsuit have been ruling in May 1854 within the same month. The Negro's name was Dred Scott, the name has been used to indicate the final judgment in this case made. Before the ensuing presidential election, which the United States Supreme Court lawsuit was submitted for debate; but deferred to the judgment of the Supreme Court after the election. However, before almirah the election, Senator Trumbull Senate gallery in the main advocates of Nebraska Act requires a description of how the people of the Territories almirah can exclude slavery within their boundaries under the Constitution, the latter replied that : "This is a question by the Supreme Court ruling."
Election coming up, Mr. Buchanan was elected, which contributed to its nature as the only recognized as said above, this is their second win outcome. However, this recognition almirah with 400,000 votes and lack of a clear majority, so maybe not been overwhelming confidence and satisfaction. The outgoing president's response, in his last annual message as much as possible about moving to the importance of this recognition and authority to the people. Supreme Court met again, did not announce their verdict, but the command to reopen the debate. The arrival of the presidential inauguration, the Supreme almirah Court has yet to make a judgment; successor President in his inaugural address, fervently almirah warned the people, regardless of the verdict to be announced had to obey. Then, a few days after the announcement of the verdict. Famous authors Nebraska Act early speech in the capital to seize the opportunity to support the case of Dred Scott decision and strongly condemns all opposition. The new president also seize the opportunity to support and trying almirah to explain this judgment, and for people who have different views and expressed surprise.
Finally, almirah between the president almirah and the author of the Nebraska bill has set off a quarrel, the problem is only the fact that AstraZeneca Templeton Constitution is not legally enacted by the people of Kansas; in the dispute, who declared that he requested almirah the author The only fair vote of the people, and does not care whether slavery was rejected. I think his intention was not to show that he does not care whether slavery was rejected, but to subtly explained almirah he wanted to make a public policy firmly in mind - he claimed he had a feeling that this is a pain, and the principle of willing the pain in the end. He can stick to this principle. If he has any parent feel like he can certainly persist. This principle only remnants of his original Nebraska principles. In the case of Dred Scott case had, the sovereignty of the people gradually almirah disappeared - as a temporary scaffolding collapsed wildly - like the glass in the mold, in a blow after using, Sanders was thrown back into the - after the first election using, it was abandoned side. He later together with the Republican opposition Unicorn Templeton Constitution, it did not mention the original Nebraska doctrine. That struggle is built around a problem, that the people almirah of the presence or absence of a place to develop their own constitutional rights, but at this point, he never disagreement with the Republicans.
(3) whether the body in a free state and the actual position of blacks in slavery entitled to freedom, almirah which is detrimental to their masters, this issue can not be decided by the courts of other States, and should be left to the owner of the blacks could force him into slave states of any court judgment. Made after this one, although not immediately implemented, but as long as acquiescence in the short term, and an election to be recognized from the people on the surface, you can confirm the conclusion that the long-term logic: since Dred Scott Illinois owner treats his practice is legal, then, in the State of Illinois almirah or any other freedom, every other master may lawfully treat so any one or a thousand other slaves.
Review and briefly repeat a series of historical facts already mentioned, you can make an issue after further see. There are a few things seem clear now than when they had appeared, not so mysterious. People are placed in the "complete freedom", "subject only to the Constitution" status. As to how the constitution will deal with these issues, then outsiders can not see. It is now clear enough, and that is what is suitable for the Dred Scott case was later to play a role, and declared all freedom is no freedom in a way the people. Why is the right to veto amendments to publicly declare the people? It is now clear enough, and formally adopted the right approach almirah would undermine the Dred Scott case for judgment. Why the court decision was shelved? Why even have a personal opinion senator also been suppressed until after the presidential election to allow publication? It is now clear enough, let him say those words would harm "completely free" election debate rely on. Why the outgoing President's message published on the recognition that term? Why reopen the debate be postponed? Why is the incoming president to warn people in advance to support the decision? It seems like these things people are afraid to ride a horse, he would fall, and step onto the horse in front of it in advance and carefully conducted pat comfort. So why the president and others eager recognized in retrospect almirah it?
We can not know for sure, all this accurate adaptation actions are pre-agreed results. But when we see a lot of wood molding, we know that these are different shapes of wood at different times and locations made by these different workers Stephen, Franklin, Roger and James out, when we see these timbers joined in together, we see that they constitute just a house or a factory, all of the tenon mortise completely different lengths and sizes of wood are perfectly suited to their respective positions, almirah but a few, a lot - even Scaffolding has not been ignored - or, if you are missing a piece of wood, we'll just have to see architecture in a suitable location, has been ready to embed this piece of wood - in this case, we can not believe Stephen , Franklin, Roger and James are familiar with each other from the outset, and is already formulating plans and sketches based on good conduct pre-construction work.
According to Nebraska Act, a state or quasi-state people have been placed in the "complete freedom", "subject only to the Constitution" status, which should not be overlooked. Why mention a State? They are for quasi-state, not to make laws from state to state, nor is it related to the formulation of the laws of the State. Of course, the people of a state is, it must be subject to the United States Constitution: But why should this hard Chejin this only for the quasi-state laws go? Why put the people and the people of a quasi-state of a confused state, and exactly the same view of their relationship with the Constitution? Tenney Court of Justice said an opinion almirah on Dred Scott case, and all the personal opinion of the judges involved in the trial are explicitly claimed that the United States Constitution does not allow Congress or any legislative body of a quasi-state quasi-state in the United States exclusion of slavery, but they have forgotten to illustrate this is the same Constitution permits a State, or the people almirah of a state to exclude slavery. Likely, this is just an oversight; However, if McLean or Curtis attempted to exclude the people about a state of slavery unrestricted power of these views in a statement to put in their states, or Chase or Metz For a quasi-state almirah interests of the people of such a statement in an attempt to go into the Nebraska bill - I have to ask, who is certainly not the case that was rejected as before? Judge Nelson's closest approach to declare a state the right to decide almirah the issue of slavery. More than once he made this representation, using the views of Nebraska Act, and even language. On one occasion he used language is this: "In addition to the United States by the Constitution to limit its powers, the laws of the state of slavery for a variety of issues within the scope of its jurisdiction is paramount." Under what circumstances almirah would the state authority is limited so the United States Constitution, almirah is an issue to be discussed, as the alignment of power in the state of Nebraska Act also limits the issues discussed as yet. These two together, we see another ingenious way to not be long before we can see that the Supreme Court announced that the United States Constitution does not allow a state within its boundaries to exclude another judgment of slavery. almirah If you "do not care whether slavery was rejected," saying enough to win the goodwill of the public thought that they promised to make such a judgment can be obtained once implemented, there will be a State may not exclude slavery within its boundaries of situation.
Full significance of such a judgment to show that: slavery in all states now require the same legal status. Welcome or not welcome such a judgment will always appear almirah soon use to us, unless the current political dynasty objected to this, and was overthrown. We will lie down comfortably dreaming of the people of Missouri will soon make their state became a free state, on the contrary, almirah we woke up to see the Supreme Court has made Illinois become a slave state facts. Oppose and overthrow the political dynasty of work is put all the people willing to prevent the kind of results before. This is what we must do. How can we best do this job?
Some publicly scold us in front of their own people, but also on our side whispered softly Senator Douglas is most suitable tool to achieve this goal. They want us to working with him according to the head of the dynasty has little almirah dispute almirah existing, and often on a single issue the same opinion with us, never facts and inferences all the differences. They remind us that he is a great person, and we have the greatest but some small figure. Granted, this is it. "But a living dog is stronger than a dead lion." In this piece of work is concerned, Judge Douglas, if not a dead lion, but also in a cage, the old lion lost teeth. How could he do against the introduction of slavery? He did not care about this matter. His avowed mission is moving "public conscience" do not control it. Democrat Douglas sent an important newspaper said, oppose the purchase of slaves from Africa to work need to Douglas excellence. Douglas is believed to restore the kind of trading activity already almirah underway? He did not say so. He really think it? However, if the activities of the ongoing restoration of the slave trade, almirah how can he oppose it then? Over the years he has been trying to prove to black slaves into the new quasi-state is a sacred right of whites. He said that in the place with the lowest possible sale of slaves buying slaves is a less sacred rights? In Africa undoubtedly almirah less than the price of buying slaves in Virginia. He tried to reduce the whole question of slavery within the reach of power just a question of property rights; same opinion, how can he oppose the foreign slave trade it? "Property" as "complete freedom", then except to protect its production, how could he refuse the kind of deal? As the country's producers are likely almirah to require protection, there is no reason he opposed. We know that Senator Douglas advocates an intelligent person today than yesterday, it is appropriate - he found he was wrong to change your mind is appropriate. Can we infer that he would prematurely almirah make hinted that he himself did not change for some special reasons based on this? Our actions almirah based on such vague inference reliable top? As usual, almirah I do not want to distort the position of Judge Douglas, and suspected his motives, or do anything detrimental to his personal matter. Just once he and we can stand together on principle, our cause will certainly almirah get help from his remarkable talent, and I hope I did not set any obstacles of field. However, it is clear that he is not, and we stand together - he does not pretend to be with us, he never promised to be with us.
So, we have to pay utilities